Worksharing: A tool to avoid layoffs in Ohio

Seventeen states are using a creative approach to helping employers and workers weather bad times. These programs, which allow the payment of unemployment benefits to workers at employers that shorten workweeks instead of laying off staff, can benefit Ohio workers and the companies that employ them in several ways. Employers can retain skilled employees, avoid expensive retraining and rehiring, and boost employee morale, when compared to layoffs. Employees can maintain much of their income and stay employed. A bill in the Ohio House of Representatives would establish such a program, known as worksharing or short-time compensation. Worksharing is no panacea, but it would provide a means for some Ohio employers to avert layoffs.

Press Release

Executive Summary

Full Report

Panel held on economic challenges facing young adults

On April 26th, 2010 Amy Hanauer, along with Nancy Cauthen (Demos), Lindsay McCluskey (United States Student Association), Monique Menefee (Tri-C) and Ohio State Senator Nina Turner, held a panel discussion on the economic challenges facing young adults and how federal and state policies can restore opportunities for the next generation. Click here to view the event flyer.

Building Ohio’s Future Middle Class

Ohio’s young adults are coming of age in a tough economy, ravaged by a deep recession and further damaged by 30 years of declining opportunity and security for all but the most highly educated and affluent. High education costs, lower wages for young people than in the past, and weaker regulation of exploitative lending combine to put young adults behind, just as they should be getting started.

This report from Policy Matters Ohio and Demos documents how weakening policies and structural changes are making things harder for today’s young individuals and families. The middle class that was created in a previous generation was no accident – the New Deal, the GI bill, the higher minimum wage, the higher education act – all helped young people get education and start their families. We can recommit to policies that build Ohio’s future middle class. This report provides the details.

Press Release

ABJ Guest Editorial

Full Report

Young, broke and on your own in Ohio

by Amy Hanauer and Nancy Cauthen, in The Akron Beacon Journal 

Ohio’s young adults are coming of age in a tough economy, ravaged by a deep recession and further damaged by 30 years of declining opportunity and security for all but the most highly educated and affluent. Economic opportunity for young Ohioans has expanded in some important areas — such as college enrollment and women’s earnings — but overall trends are worrisome.

Skyrocketing costs make it difficult for students to complete their degrees, employment has become less stable, earnings have declined steeply for workers without a four-year college degree, and young adults are increasingly saddled with debt.

Why do today’s young adults face steeper financial challenges than their parents did?

A new report by Policy Matters Ohio and Demos points first to changes in the economy itself. Since the 1970s, technology and globalization have contributed to the erosion of Ohio’s manufacturing sector. As unionized blue-collar jobs that paid decent wages and provided health and retirement benefits gradually disappeared, growth occurred in the low-wage service sector where jobs are typically nonunion and offer less security and fewer (or no) benefits.

In the process, earnings for men ages 25 to 29 with no education beyond high school fell by one-third in the 40 years since 1970. Our report, ”Building Ohio’s Future Middle Class: Addressing the Challenges Facing Young Adults,” also argues that public policy failed to keep pace as the economy changed.

In the decades following World War II, Americans experienced unprecedented opportunities. First, the GI Bill and then the Higher Education Act of 1965 increased access to college and made it more affordable. Homeownership increased as government programs enabled more people to obtain home loans, made mortgage interest tax deductible, promoted suburban housing development and enacted reforms to end discriminatory lending practices.

Income and wealth grew as public policy fueled the economy by ensuring a tight labor market, promoting full employment and erecting fewer barriers to union organizing. Federal legislation raised the minimum wage to a historical high in 1968.

Postwar federal policy efforts were bolstered by state investments — in a strong state university system, highways and other infrastructure — all of which created opportunities for hard-working Ohioans to enter the middle class. In short, the expansion of a thriving middle class in Ohio in the 1960s and 1970s didn’t just happen — government, business leaders and workers forged an implicit social contract that rewarded responsibility with opportunity.

The unraveling of the social contract has left us all more vulnerable in what’s been called the ”you’re on your own” economy, but young people must confront the full force of these trends. Earnings for full-time workers under age 35 are substantially lower today than a generation ago, except for women with a college degree.

All the hallmarks of a middle-class life — a college degree, a home, family security — are more expensive. Two-thirds of four-year college students in Ohio graduate with student loan debt averaging $24,000. Ohio renters ages 25 to 34 spend a third of their incomes on housing. The average annual price of full-time center-based child care for two preschool-age children in Ohio is nearly $17,000.

How are young Ohioans balancing lower earnings with higher costs? They are racking up debt not only to pay for school but also to cover basic expenses.

It doesn’t have to be this way. The right policies can restore opportunity for Ohio’s young people and rebuild entryways to the middle class. The health-care bill recently signed into law allows young people to stay on their parents’ plans longer and helps low-income adults afford care, an important first step toward an improved social contract.

The same piece of legislation — the Healthcare and Education Affordability Act — invests $36 billion in need-based financial aid for low-income college students by eliminating wasteful subsidies for private student loan lenders.

Last year’s recovery act hasn’t yet fixed an economy that had barely survived the car wreck brought on by decades of deregulation and disinvestment. But it has at least gotten things moving slowly in the right direction.

In Ohio, we must work to restore cuts made in the current budget to need-based grants and internships, particularly for community college students. Additional necessary steps include creating good jobs through the public sector to ease unemployment and regulating abusive lending practices.

Good public policy created America’s middle class in the era after World War II and now it is time to build a better future for the next generation.

Let’s not let the moment pass.

Legislative Briefing on Unemployment Compensation

In an April 2010 event co-sponsored by the Ohio Workforce Coalition, Policy Matters Ohio held a legislative briefing on unemployment compensation.

UC is a crucial support for jobless Ohioans that also helps stimulate the economy. Last year, more than half a million Ohioans – an average of close to 200,000 people a week — received unemployment compensation. With jobless spells lasting longer, nearly 250,000 remained on state benefits so long that they ran out. Importantly, Congress provided extended federal benefits allowing unemployed Ohioans to receive benefits for up to 99 weeks in all.

Ohio needs to take advantage of another federal provision that grants states funds for taking steps to modernize their UC systems. Ohio has received $88 million in such funds so far, but could obtain another $176 million if it implements two of the following four options by August 2011:

1. Benefits to those seeking part-time work;
2. Extended benefits to individuals in approved training;
3. Benefits to individuals who leave work for compelling family reasons (domestic violence, transfer of a spouse, illness of an immediate relative); or
4. A minimum $15/week dependent allowance, up to $50 a week

States across the country have approved such measures. These measures would bring Ohio’s system in line with the realities of today’s workforce, while their cost would be paid for at least several years with the federal money.

Ohio’s UC system needs to be improved in another way, too: It has not been adequately financed. Ohio taxes only the first $9,000 or less than a quarter of each worker’s wage. Many states have moved to pay-as-you-go financing of their UC systems, reducing the financial cushion they used to provide in advance of economic downturns. And Ohio went further than most, keeping taxes below the national average. The system was going broke as a result of this undertaxation. As unemployment grew and people were unemployed for longer periods of time, benefit levels skyrocketed, adding to the deficit.

Like 33 other states and the Virgin Islands, Ohio now is borrowing from the federal government to pay benefits. Yet despite the fund’s fiscal condition, the tax-rate schedule for many Ohio companies was actually reduced this year, costing tens of millions of dollars in revenue.

Ohio should take steps to:
• Eliminate automatic tax cuts such as the one that happened this year
• Create a surtax to pay interest on the debt to the U.S., if necessary
• Phase in a substantial increase in the taxable wage base, and index it to wages
• Support a higher federal taxable wage base and federal relief for states that improve solvency without cutting benefits
• Temporarily freeze increases in maximum benefits, as proposed in 2008

Click here to view the presentation

For more information, see the following reports:

Stimulus for Ohio: U.S. Unemployment Compensation Aid

Why Ohio’s Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund is Going Broke, and What We Should Do About It

Ohio Still Excludes Many from Unemployment Compensation

Federal Tax Plans Compared

Proposal to Make Bush Tax Cuts Permanent Would Result in $35,722 Break for Richest 1% in Ohio, Higher Taxes for Ohio’s Middle Class

As Capital Hill debates making the Bush tax cuts permanent, Citizens for Tax Justice analyzes the impact of the President’s approach and that of the Republicans. The President would ease the burden on middle and lower income families by making permanent the increase in Child Tax Credit (CTC) and Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) included in last year’s federal stimulus package, as well as institutionalizing the Bush tax cuts for 98 percent of Americans (all but the wealthiest two percent of American families, whose tax cuts would be allowed to expire).

Eighty percent of Ohio earners (the bottom four income quintiles, which includes lower and middle income families) would see a bigger tax benefit under the Obama’s approach than the Republican’s. The wealthiest one percent of Ohio families would still see their taxes reduced, but the average benefit of the Republican approach for these top earners ($57,986) is reduced to an average of $22,264 under the President’s approach.

Read about it in the national report and Ohio fact sheet released jointly by Citizens for Tax Justice and Policy Matters Ohio.

Press Release

Ohio Fact Sheet

National Report

 

 

 

 

Legislative briefing held on unemployment compensation

In an April 21, 2010, event co-sponsored by the Ohio Workforce Coalition, Policy Matters Ohio held a legislative briefing on unemployment compensation. Zach Schiller described how the state should modernize its UC system to take advantage of federal funds, and take steps to return the system to solvency. Click here for more information.

Provisions to ensure advanced energy jobs grow at home: Rebates, border adjustment and domestic content

Output-based rebates, border adjustments and domestic content:
Provisions to ensure advanced energy jobs grow at home

National policy to cap carbon emissions is needed to create domestic advanced energy markets and to stabilize a return on investments in those markets. Midwestern legislators have called for a set of policies to ensure American producers are not undercut by trading partners with lax environmental regulations. In this issue brief, we explain three policy proposals that can secure domestic jobs without damaging international relationships: output-based rebates, border adjustments and domestic content provisions. We conclude that concerns associated with these policies are overstated, particularly with regard to domestic content, where technical solutions like a unified web page and improved waiver protocol could provide an inexpensive means to support domestic manufacturing.

Full Brief

Related link from Senator Brown’s office – Midwestern senators see strengthening domestic market critical to their industrial base:

Press Release

Buy America: Transportation Manufacturing and Domestic Content Requirements

First Organizational Meeting for the Lorain County Transit Coalition convenes

Amanda Woodrum convened the First Organizational Meeting for the Lorain County Transit Coalition on April 15, 2010 to address solutions for Lorain County’s transit funding problems. Click here to view the event flyer.

Policy Matters Ohio Reviews Ohio Tax and Budget Issues

Policy Matters Knows Taxes

April 15, 2010 — In the past year or so, Policy Matters Ohio has completed a dozen analyses and one magazine article reviewing Ohio’s tax, revenue and budget situation. In summary, these find that Ohio has substantially cut taxes over the past five years, adding to the national economic downturn to create a tight revenue situation. Others have documented what this has meant for services in Ohio, which have already been devastated by the cuts. The federal stimulus provided extensive fiscal relief, but without further federal aid even more drastic cuts will be required.

Press Release