Automatic federal cuts would hit Ohio hard
- December 17, 2012
Don’t make a fiscal deal that increases inequality or poverty, group says
The Budget Control Act of 2011, which is pushing federal funding toward what pundits are calling a “fiscal cliff,” includes spending limits and cuts that would cost Ohio hundreds of millions of dollars each year for the next decade, according to a statement released today by Policy Matters Ohio.
To avoid automatic cuts and spending limits, Congressional leaders are promoting an approach to taxes and spending that would get rid of unemployment insurance for thousands of Ohio families, create deep cuts in safety net programs, and eliminate cuts that have reduced taxes for middle-class and poor families.
“This is the wrong path,” said Amy Hanauer, executive director at Policy Matters. “As policymakers navigate the choices facing them, they must keep core principles in mind. Most importantly, they must not make a deal that increases inequality or impoverishes more children.”
Any agreement must raise significant revenues from the wealthiest, support economic growth and job creation, and preserve tax cuts for the middle class, according to the statement, Principles for a better budget deal. At the same time, the outcome must not increase poverty or inequality, or shift costs to states.
“A bad deal – one that would hurt families and children, deepen poverty and hardship, and increase inequality – would be worse than no deal at all,” said Hanauer. “Policymakers must take the time to craft a plan that will strengthen economic growth and protect families in Ohio and across the country.”