

|
Sunday, October 13, 2002
Ohioans face hard facts
By Doug Oplinger Stephen
Dyer and Dennis J. Willard Akron Beacon Journal
Ohio overtaken by other states
Earl, now 70, is retired from the Ford plant
in Lorain. Thelma, 65, stayed home with their four children.
Their house -- a few miles from a Sandusky
exit on the Ohio Turnpike -- is small and neatly kept. A decorative
windmill stands in the back yard.
On Nov. 5, they plan to do something they
think can still make a difference: Vote.
Or about friends who take bus trips to
Canada to buy prescription drugs at a lower cost.
Earl McKinney worries about his
ever-increasing property taxes and how his wife will pay them when he's
gone.
Meanwhile, businesses down the road receive
tax abatements and emit strong, nauseating fumes that prevent them from
sitting on their porch.
Earl McKinney, who volunteered to go onto
the battlefield as a medic in the Korean War, pores over tax-abatement,
environmental and workplace-health documents looking for a fight. He
believes that with businesses in Ohio, anything goes.
He raises heck at local government meetings.
Tears come when he talks about the challenges facing poor children.
One of the things Earl and Thelma McKinney
cherish most -- family -- has been split apart. Declining job
opportunities in Ohio led two of their four children to move across the
country to find a better life.
Family separation is commonplace in Ohio --
a state where family values are considered an asset.
In a statewide poll conducted by Zogby
International for the Akron Beacon Journal, half of the respondents said
they have an immediate family member who left Ohio for a job or an
education.
Two out of three know that Ohio's national
ranking for personal income has declined since its peak around 1960, but
in interviews they are surprised how far the state has fallen in
comparison with the rest of the country.
The decline has happened in spite of
Ohioans' belief that they are ``hard workers.'' That's what they said in
the poll, and what the statistics show.
In 1999, 6.3 percent of Ohioans worked two
jobs, compared with 5.6 percent nationally.
Married couples with children are working 11
more hours a week than 20 years ago, according to Policy Matters Ohio, a
Cleveland research organization.
``It makes me want to move to Wyoming,'' Jim
Koppes said after listening to a list of statistics about Ohio, including
those detailing the state's poor health.
Koppes is a Medina businessman who operates
a hay farm. Ohio's development policies, which encourage businesses to
move out of cities into rural and suburban areas, are eating up the land
he uses for farming.
Divided we fall
Seeds of the economic decline were planted
30 or 40 years ago.
State government, business and educational
leaders often point to one reason: Ohio is diverse, if not divisive.
Special interests are either unwilling or unable to come together on a
plan for the future. The most glaring example was five years ago when a coalition of business leaders, educators and government officials put together the ingredients of a good public education.
When it was time to make difficult decisions
about costs, the coalition disappeared.
Divisiveness is a problem recognized beyond
Ohio's borders.
A recent University of Toronto study of
manufacturing states and provinces used Ohio as an example of a state
lacking an economic identity or a plan.
Gov. Bob Taft says his Third Frontier plan
helps Ohio business with money for research and development. However, the
9-month-old plan needs funding by the legislature and voter approval of a
bond issue, which won't happen until mid-2003 at the earliest.
At a recent National Governor's Association
meeting, a Harvard Business School researcher who was telling governors
how to build on their strengths, showed a U.S. map identifying 12 major
specialized regional economies. Not one was in Ohio.
William ``Brit'' Kirwan, who came from
Maryland to become president of Ohio State University, left less than four
years later with an observation: The Ohio business community and state
leaders view higher education as a special interest group with its hand
out for money.
Kirwan and other state university presidents
argue that universities, businesses and government have been successful in
other states -- particularly Georgia -- in creating attractive, growing
economies whose strengths are research, development and a highly educated
work force.
University presidents in Georgia, Maryland
and Texas go to the governor arm in arm with business representatives,
Kirwan said. Not in Ohio.
Kirwan returned to Maryland after Ohio's
leaders slashed the budget for higher education and the governor
introduced a program to direct state dollars directly to helping
businesses with research and development -- with or without the help of
universities.
``If I were giving advice, I would urge the
governor to bring together the business leadership with the university
leadership to develop this grand design, this vision. That is in my
opinion,'' Kirwan said. ``Until they connect, I don't think things are
really going to happen.''
Kirwan said that the Ohio Business
Roundtable -- an organization of top corporate leaders -- excludes higher
education.
Richard Stoff, executive director of the
round table, said the business group wants to speak as one business voice,
which is no different from the national Business Roundtable. Educators and
nonprofit groups can't be members, but the round table works with them in
many ways, he said.
``When we're dealing with issues of economic
growth, our members are very sensitive to the role played = [100.0]by
universities,'' Stoff said.
He said at least half of the round table
members serve on university boards of trustees.
Business organizations say a priority in the
state should be to assure that schools are producing workers with basic
and technological skills.
Yet, Donn Force, a retired community leader
and former superintendent of Green Local Schools in Summit County, said he
sat dumbfounded as he listened to an organizing representative of the Ohio
Chamber of Commerce explain how to establish a local chamber.
The organizer advised business people not to
allow schools -- or any other governmental unit-- to become voting members
of the local chamber.
Educational and other governmental issues
can conflict with the best interests of businesses, the organizer said.
``I'm sitting in the room and not saying
anything,'' Force said. He wondered: How can business and education ever
have conflicts of interest?
He said that's no different from a labor
union with a distinct point of view.
Ohio Department of Development Director
Bruce Johnson acknowledges that there are divisions that make it
politically difficult to create a plan.
The problem, as he sees it, is that there
are at least eight major interests -- one for each large city -- competing
for state dollars.
Other states make gains
Lack of a plan has taken a toll. According to national statistics of economic output, Ohio has been stagnant for 20 years.
Florida passed Ohio in the 1980s to become
the sixth-largest state economy.
Georgia and North Carolina rapidly are
approaching Ohio from far behind, and if growth trends don't change, they
will overtake the Buckeye State in little more than 10 years.
Many of Ohio's economic leaders have
disappeared. Gone are the strong corporations and unions that established
high pay and good benefits that treated genders and races equally.
The number of Fortune 500 companies
headquartered in the state fell by a third from a peak in the 1960s. Gone
are such companies as Firestone and General Tire, which employed highly
paid manufacturing workers and highly paid, well-educated corporate staffs
that generate more jobs.
Union membership as a percentage of the work
force has fallen from 38 percent to 18 percent since 1964. Ohio fell from
eighth most unionized state in 1960 to 17th today.
Since at least 1960, Ohio has been below the
national average for percentage of managerial, administrative, research
and technical workers -- highly paid workers whose work and lifestyles
tend to create additional jobs -- according to census data.
It's those workers who were most likely to
escape the downward spiral of income in Ohio.
The implications for Ohio's
African-Americans and lower-income workers have been profound, according
to Amy Hanauer, executive director and researcher for Policy Matters Ohio,
a Cleveland research group funded primarily by the George Gund Foundation.
``The late '90s were a good period for Ohio
wages,'' she said, but the long-term trend is a deterioration of income
for about 80 percent of Ohio's workers. The declining role of union wage scales significantly widened the hourly wage gap between black and white men, she found. The gap was about $1.40 in 1979 but doubled to $3 in 2001 after adjusting for inflation. At the same time, black men saw their hourly rate plunge
from $15.32 an hour to $12, she said.
Hanauer echoed the same concern as the
university presidents: Education is an issue for Ohio's work force -- 11th
least educated in the nation.
``Bachelor's degrees are becoming ever more
important'' to economic gains, she said.
``The idea that we should give business
everything it wants, and lower taxes, that we'll be halfway to the
promised land -- this has been the de facto policy for decades -- and it
hasn't worked,'' Schiller said.
``We have to plan and we have to figure out
what's best for the state and act on it,'' he said. ``We can't expect that
private business, left unfettered, will bring about the kinds of gains we
expect to see in every aspect of our life.''
Not so bad?
Meanwhile, some continue to paint a cheery
picture for Ohio.
Recently, the governor's office said Target
Corp.'s decision to build a distribution center near Columbus is ``another
economic victory for the state of Ohio.''
The warehouse will employ about 900 and pay
annual wages of about $28,000, according to a news release. Ten years ago,
that was Ohio's median income.
Ohioans have become discontented as the
state's job growth has been in lower-wage jobs.
Basil Slimack, a retired Orthodox priest in
suburban Canton, has two daughters in Florida, where they have jobs. His
mother, who lives in Michigan, has far better state-supportedhealth care
than if she lived in Ohio.
He said that Ohio is among the most
aggressive in taxing retirement income, and when he dies, he would be
better off dying in another state so his heirs can get more of his estate.
``For a retiree, you'd be better off leaving
Ohio,'' Slimack said.
``This state is stagnant. It's making no
progress,'' he said.
Andrea Moehle of Medina sat at a soccer game
and thought about why she likes Ohio.
But as she thought about the state's job
opportunities for educated people and looked at her son on the soccer
field, she added: ``I (could) understand him wanting to leave. It would be
nice if we could catch up to other states so he could stay.''
Dennis J. Willard can be reached at
614-224-1613 or dwillard@qn.net
Akron Beacon Journal 10/13/2002
|
Policy Matters Ohio 2912 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, OH 44115
ph: 216/931-9922 fax: 216/931-9924
http://www.policymattersohio.org
Policy Matters Ohio is a non-profit policy research organization founded in January 2000 to broaden the debate about economic policy in Ohio. Our mission is to conduct high-quality research promoting decisions which benefit our whole community. Given the challenges of a rapidly-changing economic system, rising wage inequality, new issues in education and changes in the way work is organized, it is imperative that Ohio workers have a voice in the economic debate.
Policy Matters provides real-world analysis focused on issues that matter to low- and middle-income workers in Ohio. Our findings are accessible to the public, the media, and policy makers. We hope to strengthen democracy by providing Ohio's citizens with the essential tools to participate in the public discussion on the economy. We believe this will result in economic policies that better reflect the public interest.