

|
Sunday, January 22, 2006 Ohio Slices Seniors' Jobless Benefits By Catherine Candisky Columbus Dispatch
At 77, Donald A. Hyatt Sr. is still working
because he likes to keep busy and needs the money to supplement his Social
Security check.
Last year, when his company announced it
would lay off workers, Hyatt was stunned to learn he was not eligible for
unemployment benefits.
It turns out that thousands of older Ohioans
do not qualify for benefits if they lose their job.
Ohio is the only state that reduces jobless
benefits by 100 percent against Social Security.
As a result, unemployment compensation for
Social Security recipients often is cut to nothing.
"I've been working here 25 years," said
Hyatt, a machinist at L.B. Heating and Cooling in Mount Vernon.
"Why can't an elderly person collect
unemployment if his company is paying into it? I think it's a scam."
With more older Ohioans in the work force
out of necessity, the issue has become a top concern of advocates for
seniors and the jobless, including AARP Ohio and Policy Matters Ohio, a
Cleveland based nonprofit research organization.
Ohio's Unemployment Compensation Advisory
Council is reviewing the matter, and a Republican state lawmaker is
pushing to end Ohio's "offset" of Social Security.
Rep. William J. Seitz, Cincinnati, hopes "to
help our senior citizens who are rudely awakened to find their Social
Security benefits are offset against their unemployment comp benefits when
they have to get a second job merely because Social Security isn't
enough."
The way it works in Ohio:
- If you're entitled to $100 a week in
unemployment benefits and
- If you re entitled to $200 a week in
unemployment benefits
Zach Schiller of Policy Matters says the
practice is unfair because
"A lot of retirees are working because they
need to supplement their retirement income," said AARP Ohio spokeswoman
Kathy Keller.
Anita Wilhelm, a widow from Miamitown, had
been working 30 years for a wholesale distributor when she was let go in
2003 at age 70.
"I was continuing to work because my husband
passed away, and Social Security is fine, but it's not enough," said
Wilhelm, now 72.
"I realize I didn't pay, but the company
paid and that's what it's for. The gentleman from unemployment told me
they needed to take care of the younger workers."
Keller said many others being denied
benefits took early retirement usually at 62 and have started new careers
as they receive lower retirement and Social Security benefits.
The Ohio Department of Job and Family
Services estimates 2,360 unemployment claims are made each year by those
collecting Social Security. To extend jobless benefits to them would cost
about $12 million annually.
The money would come from Ohio's
unemployment trust fund.
The balance, currently at $446 million, is
expected to dip to about $300 million in April before rebuilding.
Agency spokesman Jon Allen said the
department does not oppose eliminating the offset.
But opinions differ among the co-chairmen of
Ohio's Unemployment Compensation Advisory Council, which makes
recommendations to the General Assembly. The council is expected to
discuss the issue at its next meeting, Feb. 8.
"We understand that it's a problem, and what
we're trying to do is determine what amount of an offset we should have,"
said council co-chairman William A. Burga, president of the Ohio AFLCIO.
But co-chairman Andrew E. Doehrel, president
of the Ohio Chamber of Commerce, opposes extending unemployment benefits
to Social Security recipients.
"If you're going to start draining the
system," he said, "you will put benefits at risk for everyone."
Unemployment benefits, Doehrel said, "were
designed to be a bridge to help someone when they don't have other
resources. . . . It's not meant to cure anything other than that."
He also cautioned that reducing or
eliminating the Social Security offset would make it impossible to
implement other proposals, such as one to reduce the earnings requirement.
In Ohio, workers must have earned at least $193 a week to be eligible for
unemployment benefits. Some argue it should be lower so more workers can
qualify.
Policy Matters says that Ohio is the only
state that offsets 100 percent of Social Security benefits against
unemployment benefits.
Eight states offset 50 percent.
Columbus Dispatch 1/22/2006
|
Policy Matters Ohio 2912 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, OH 44115
ph: 216/931-9922 fax: 216/931-9924
http://www.policymattersohio.org
Policy Matters Ohio is a non-profit policy research organization founded in January 2000 to broaden the debate about economic policy in Ohio. Our mission is to conduct high-quality research promoting decisions which benefit our whole community. Given the challenges of a rapidly-changing economic system, rising wage inequality, new issues in education and changes in the way work is organized, it is imperative that Ohio workers have a voice in the economic debate.
Policy Matters provides real-world analysis focused on issues that matter to low- and middle-income workers in Ohio. Our findings are accessible to the public, the media, and policy makers. We hope to strengthen democracy by providing Ohio's citizens with the essential tools to participate in the public discussion on the economy. We believe this will result in economic policies that better reflect the public interest.