Carroll County

October 31, 2012
   
State overview
Download PDF

Impact of the Ohio 2012-13 state budget (HB 153)

Ohio’s budget for 2012 and 2013 cut local government aid by a billion dollars.  This means cuts in services we depend on, from road repair and emergency services to crossing guards, senior transportation and child protective services.  What are the implications for Carroll County?

The state cut the Local Government Fund to the county, forcing Carroll County to make cuts to jurisdictions within the county. The state also cut direct funding to municipalities, and slashed reimbursements for taxes it had eliminated, taxes that businesses and utilities had paid to local governments. School districts and the public library fund were also cut. Losses in calendar years 2012 and 2013, compared to 2010 and 2011, include, among others:

  • Public Library Fund…………… -$51.0 thousand
  • Schools………………………….. -$3.0 million
  • County operations…………….. -$880.0 thousand
  • Brown Township………………. -$39.0 thousand
  • Carrollton……………………….. -$53.0 thousand

Loss to health and human service levies

  • County Mental Health………… -$221.0 thousand
  • Carroll County Seniors………… -$26.0 thousand                          

Notable notes, quotable quotes

“Most of our employees have been with us for several years and are maxed out on the pay scale,” she noted. “The last time our employees had a pay raise was in 2008. They have been furloughed, and had their pay reduced. We have made cutbacks, eliminated office space and implemented other cost-saving measures. Our employees are our most important asset and I think it is time they were recognized.” – Kate Offenberger, Director of Carroll County Department of Job and Family Services. From McIntire, Carol. “Commissioners approve pay raise request.” Free Press Standard.  February 7, 2012. http://tinyurl.com/8dqmph6.

Mental health and drug abuse treatment have been cut sharply, even though the number of people in need of help has not been reduced. From John McCall, Director of Ohio Family and Children First Council, interview, July 25, 2012.

According to Edison School district treasurer Dennis Menoski, “the school district is facing a $1.5 million deficit next school year and must reach that amount in staff and operating expenses.” From FPS Staff Reporter. “Edison School District Levy heading to November ballot.” Free Press Standard. March 13, 2012. http://tinyurl.com/8aws25x.  

NOTES:  The current state budget cuts the Local Government Fund to counties, municipalities and townships by 25 percent in the first year and by 50 percent in the second year. This 77-year old state revenue sharing program has, for generations, been essential to helping Ohio communities fund schools, provide services, and lift people out of poverty.  The current state budget also phases out most of the tangible personal property tax and public utility property tax reimbursements, which were promised to local governments when the state cut taxes in recent years.  These are not the only losses to local governments because of this budget.  There are others in specific programs.  Here we detail some of the bigger shifts.  Change in revenues shown here include:

  • Local Government Fund “County Undivided Fund,” which counties share with their cities, townships and villages. We show how much less money the counties are receiving under the current 2-year state budget (for 2012 and 2013) compared to the two years under the prior state budget (which was for 2010 and 2011).   Here the funds are shown on a calendar year basis because that is how the tax department forecasts and records their distribution to local governments, and it is how local governments budget (The state budget is based on the fiscal year, July 1 through June 30.)
  • Local Government “Municipal Direct” allocation from the Local Government Fund that the state gives directly to localities.  This is also shown in terms of funding provided in the calendar years 2012 and 2013 compared to 2010 and 2011;
  • Property tax reimbursements promised to local governments during tax reductions enacted earlier in the decade.  The loss of funding in calendar years 2012 and 2013 is compared to the level of funding provided in 2010 and 2011.

The figures for changes in funding levels are based on data provided by and spreadsheets online at the Ohio Department of Taxation for local government funds and tax reimbursement distributions. 

Print Friendly